
\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c c}
\hline
 & Overall & Overall & Gender & Environment & Europe & Immigration \\
\hline
After women's strike & $0.27$       & $0.28$       & $-5.61$       & $2.48$       & $-1.04$      & $0.49$       \\
                     & $(0.29)$     & $(0.29)$     & $(6.98)$      & $(2.36)$     & $(3.21)$     & $(3.52)$     \\
(Intercept)          & $2.13^{***}$ & $2.02^{***}$ & $15.77^{***}$ & $9.65^{***}$ & $7.40^{***}$ & $7.84^{***}$ \\
                     & $(0.14)$     & $(0.18)$     & $(4.35)$      & $(1.47)$     & $(2.00)$     & $(2.19)$     \\
\hline
Month FEs            & \checkmark   & \checkmark   & \checkmark    & \checkmark   & \checkmark   & \checkmark   \\
Weekdays FEs         &              & \checkmark   & \checkmark    & \checkmark   & \checkmark   & \checkmark   \\
R$^2$                & $0.28$       & $0.29$       & $0.05$        & $0.10$       & $0.04$       & $0.08$       \\
Adj. R$^2$           & $0.26$       & $0.25$       & $-0.01$       & $0.05$       & $-0.02$      & $0.03$       \\
Num. obs.            & $305$        & $305$        & $305$         & $305$        & $305$        & $305$        \\
\hline
\multicolumn{7}{l}{\scriptsize{$^{***}p<0.001$; $^{**}p<0.01$; $^{*}p<0.05$}}
\end{tabular}
\caption{Statistical OLS models of the number of articles mentioning at least one female candidate. Robustness check for Table \ref{table:diffindiff} with share of all articles, rather than only those mentioning candidates.}
\label{table:appdiffindiff}
\end{center}
\end{table}
